![]() M14 mags, if reduced, would fit the bill perfectly as 44 Auto Mag is a shortened 308 case. I suppose if someone wanted to reduce the reciever on an M14, chop up the barrel, shorten the gas system, put a brake on it and adapt a Vltor or Sage EBR type stock to fit it, then you might have a viable contender. And I don't see anything holding up to that kind of pressure very long. Although it's semi-auto, it would not be a very fast shooter in any platform. With an M2 stock, it makes the weight but 30 rd M1 mags only held 10 rds and it wasn't very strong.Ī good muzzle brake would take care of the nasty recoil, but it would be pretty noisy in a 10" barrel. There were a number of conversions done to the M1 Carbine using 45 Win Mag. I probably went through about 2500 round of 7.62x39 this year, and I feel I should be shooting more too. Firing a rifle that uses 1-1.50 a round ammo will not get you far at all in training. Fields positions like standing is roughly 30-50%, but that entirely me.įor any rifle to be effective, ou need practice. That saiga and most of my SKS's can hit them close to 100% while on bench. His saiga conversion has the russian military surplus scope.įor causal shooting, I have a brake rotor at 200 yards hanging. Likely another 2 range trips.Ī fellow board member is consistently hitting a 8"x8" piece of metal at 300 yards. I want to test the gun reliability a bit more. It produced consistent 1" groups at 50 yards with golden tiger ammo ($2). I recently bought a saiga, a sporterized version of the AK47. My SKS get 2-3" groups with inferior iron sights. My friend bought an AR assembled from US military parts. Any gun assembled from worn used parts will not be reliable. I would say a 45-70 lever gun would be pretty cool, and do the job, and u wouldn't look like a swat ninja, but again, not semi auto, low capacity, expensive ammo ect,ĪK are relaitvely accurate. I think a M1A socom would really do this idea justice,super power and range yet still carbine length,ĩmm is not powerful enough unless you have a full auto or your using hollowpoints, and i'm not sure of reliability of hollowpoints in current rifles chambered in 9mm,ie 9mm AR's, century sterling, keltec folding rifle ect.ġ0 mm is an excellent choice, but no one makes any carbines in this caliber, and again, 10mm is scarce and hard to stock up on.Ī 45 carbine is cool, but no one makes one that is High capacity,u might as well carry an M4,Marlin's camp carbine in 45 was a problem gun, broke often. 450 bushmaster and 458 socom are cool, but none of us can afford to stockpile a decent amount of ammunition for a survival situation, never mind spare parts, I don't think a perfect "thumper" rifle exists. Loads using slow burning powders maximize performance in both short and long barrels, with one published load generating 1,500 ft/s (460 m/s) from a revolver, and 1,625 ft/s (495 m/s) from a carbine with a 240-grain (16 g) bullet. Tests with various ammunition in the Ruger Deerfield yielded a 100 yard (90 m) velocity of over 1,300 ft/s (400 m/s) with a 240-grain (16 g) bullet, comparable to the muzzle velocity out of a revolver. ![]() With significantly longer barrels than revolvers, carbines will generate a significantly higher velocity than a revolver loaded with the same ammunition. ![]() The lever-action Marlin Model 1894, Ruger Deerfield, and many other firearms are currently available in this caliber. ![]() 44 Magnum is sufficiently powerful for medium-sized game, yet fits easily into a compact, lightweight package. Loads using slow burning powders maximize performance in both short and long barrels, with one published load generating 1,500 ft/s (460 m/s) from a revolver, and 1,625 ft/s (495 m/s) from a carbine with a 240-grain (16 g) bullet."Īs a rifle or carbine cartridge the.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |